Re: Wow... been away for a while and

On Aug 2, 12:37=A0pm, some...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> In article <6fikq2Fboq6...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Enzo Matrix"
<enz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >some...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >> In article
> >> <163baa1d-109e-4b04-acb1-b73809fea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> eyeball <eyeball2002...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>> I just had fun doing a mild mod on an old 1/94 Lindberg F-4, mainly
> >>> just reshaping the nose and painting it as the prototype. Accurate?
> >>> Hell no, but fun. And finished in a matter of days.
>
> >> yep, them old kits is fun.
>
> >I have a Trumpeter 1/72 Gannet in my stash. =A0I also have a couple of
o=
ld
> >FROG/NOVO Gannets in my Deep Stash. =A0I'm considering building the
Trum=
peter
> >and FROG kits together to see if I can make the FROG one match the
Trump=
eter
> >one.
>
> >After that, I suppose I'll have to build a Revell Gannet just to make
up=
 the
> >set!
>
> what if you have to work to make the trumpy as good as the novo?
couldn't=
 it
> be possible that the novo is more accurate shaped or better detailed.?
> what impresses me most about trumpeter is the price. thei kits look like
> other's kits. i don't see much blatant superiority.
> too bad they don't do a 1/48 jn4.
> trumpeter makes lots of mistakes....like on their ****ps...

Trumpeter has a lot more fiddly bits and costs about a tank of gas.
I'd stick with the Novo.
And I did!