Re: Saito 91 Starting

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:19:19 -0400, David Hopper <nospam0879@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:


>>That, or they would be clock challenged.
>>
>>Just imagine those who have only been exposed to digital clocks. <G>
>>
>>Ed Cregger 
>>
>
>Would those be the ones that think a quarter past the hour is 25
>after??

Or the re****ter who thinks it is necessary to point out that the year 1622
was
"more than a quarter-century ago"

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,371287,00.html