"Kate XXXXXX" <kate@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:cvKdnUKeQ-Ad2N_VnZ2dnUVZ8szinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Pogonip wrote:
> > Kate XXXXXX wrote:
> >> Samantha Hill - remove TRASH to reply wrote:
> >>> Oh, no, don't tell me that bozo is still around! *wilt*
> >>
> >> Him and his band of idiot disciples...
> >>
> >
> > Is he related to the ones who call every 99 and Spartan a
> > "featherweight"? Love the ones who list a GE travel iron and call
it a
> > "featherweight" iron, too! Plus any set of Singer low shank
attachments
> > are "Featherweight" attachments!
>
> Yup, that crew! ;)
> >
> > Between the Featherweights and the Industrial Strength models,
they've
> > got the market cornered!
>
> I'm just waiting to see a 99 described as an 'industrial strengeth
> Featherweight'! :D :D
>
Am always gobsmacked by what sellers call "Industrial Strength" on eBay
and other places.
Vintage machines by Elna, Pfaff, Kenmore, Janome and the like are all
most always billed as "all metal parts.... industrial strength", and so
forth.
Only slightly less irritating are those selling what are true industrial
machines, but do not disclose if the machine is head only. For those
that know about these things this is not a problem, but sadly too many
naïf spend good money on a machine, only to have it arrive and find out
it needs to be mounted on a table and requires a motor.
OTHO, if someone would mis-label a vintage Singer hemstitch machine so
one could nab it at a decent price, I'd be much obliged! *LOL*
|
