On , in rec.crafts.jewelry "Neil" <neilr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Much? not in volume, no. Abrasha has often rightly accused me of
taking
>>> two
>>> pages to say what he says in two sentances.
>>
>>Or as they say around here - "why use one word when a thousand will do!"
:)
>>
>>
Oh, I agree completely. Though I should learn to remember to use the
spell
checker, or learn to spell "sentence". correctly the first time.
There are benefits to being exhaustively long winded too.
Good exercise for the typing fingers, especially for those who can no
longer
play the piano well.
Spending longer on typing a reply gives you time to reconsider the wisdom
of
replying at all. More time to change your mind and hit the "cancel"
button
instead of "send".
Spending more time on replying also gives you more time to try and
organize the
reply, remember the facts that are lurking just beyond the edge of your
brain
that you'd like to include even if they're not needed, or to just realize,
halfway through typing some tome, that you're being a total idiot and
giving a
completely wrong answer. Unfortunately for me, usually this realization
often
still does not hit me until well after I've sent the thing. But for some
folks,
the added time delay might work.
And if one is trying to sell something, but knows that advertising on this
group
isn't allowed, trapping the poor readers with your messages for a longer
time
gives them more time to subliminally absorb your tasteful URL in your sig
file.
Whether this triggers a greater avoidance factor, or a greater likelihood
of
actually clicking the link, of course, is debatable. Depends on how tired
they've become of your long winded answers...
Was that long enough?
:-)
Hoping all of you have a safe and happy New Years.
Peter
|
