On May 29, 7:07 am, NetWord <szatl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 29, 4:13 am, "Non scrivetemi"
>
>
>
> <nonscrivet...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>http://feedback.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=agent-
> > 09&ftab=AllFeedback&sspagename=STRK:ME:UFS
>
> > Go to the above link or cut and paste it pronto.
>
> > I noticed this earlier post and it answers every question. You Carl or
> > whoever is personating him is annoyingly wrong. No wonder folks are
> > always telling you you're wrong.
> > ....................................................
>
> > ALL HE HAD TO DO WAS GO TO EBAY & RT TESTIMONIALS..OH NO!
>
> > Anyone can and does. It reveals a perfect record of sales and happy
> > customers. So why does Carl continue his one-man campaign???
>
> > Unbenownst to most he must be paid by the metal detector companies to
> > knock LRLs. Pure and simple. That's probably who funded the ripoff
> > (maybe not though) contest.
>
> > Even a woman knows that you can't sell to your friends on Ebay to get
> > feedback. Leastwise not more than a couple. What sort of a
> > globetrotter would it take?? A Rockefeller. And those testimonials are
> > obviously real as can be deduced from one's intutive knowledge of
> > grammar. The site and finds etc are not inventions, neither is the
> > fact it's been like that since 2002. Seen any resold on ebay except
> > Carl's atrocious atempt to be irritating some years back?
>
> > Thank you Carl for showing us the hard bone that has grown in your
> > skull because you have been grilled by experts for being a tease.
> > Maybe bear in mind that people's livelihoods are at stake before you
> > attempt to defame what is very easily proven to be the best thing
> > since sliced bread in detection.
>
> > Glorified studfinders are no match for LRLs. Granted you are selling
> > more as people find beepers the shot for confirming finds with LRLs
> > and vice-versa.
>
> > We trust that's why you're always posting and that you have a fine
> > time relaxing after these discussions.
>
> > and that was written by a woman
> > ..........................................
> > Then go towww.rangertell.comandopen Testimonials.
> > No I may be a simple man with a hankerin to buy a good instrument but
I
> > can't say that anything you've said against RT or LRLs or who you
think
> > is running things is remotely like the facts that can be gleaned.
>
> > Maybe you need to go see the preacher like Al, unless you believe it
was
> > really Vincent Blanes. We're not talking about your paranoia here,
were
> > trying to see what LRL instruments are worth trying. I hope it was
> > Vincent Blanes, who isn't the boss of RT and dislikes your insanity!!!
> > He's a much more polished operative than you. Now it's you
> > posting 'your' re****t??? How many years has it been anon? Disgusting!!
>
> > Peruser
>
> .................
> Here is the link proper.
>
> http://feedback.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=age...
>
> Al Carson- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
................................................................
Go Peruser! People aren't going to be like that since 2002 (since ebay
was only a small part of sales) unless the LRL sold is the best value
for money out there. No feedback has been retracted, no tricks
involved. The only reason some firms have 100% good feedback is that
over thousands of items the negatives come back to 100%. There is no
secret deal mechanism. So eat your heart out Carl or whoever, nothing
you have said is anything but a contrary and jealous provocation, a
lousy attempt to belittle, a piece of shxxt. My personation has been
forgiven. Now people can see the reason I have sallied you at each
turn for your crassness. The Lord must have appointed me to speak for
the LRL and others. Alleluia! Now I can see!!
Al
|
