There is a very convincing piece of LRL behavior that I suspect has
tricked those who will not espouse the idea of a device working
independently of the mind. It is so compelling at first that I feel
it
is not impossible that a post re it I made a month or two ago may
have
even led to the departure of Sam from the forums. I say this because
following the post he posted no more under the name Sam. This after
nine years of continual posting at the same angle ie that LRLx were
ideomotor inspired, end of story. I seek no kudos though as I wish to
remain anonymous for reasons of simple preference.
The effect is simply that known to dowsers. If you look at a sample
or
target for long enough or even for a short period depending on your
LRL or rod you will get a sweep to it or away from it depending
seemingly on your whim, not unlike a pendulum supposedly swings for
yes and no.
Aha, say the skeptics and others. That proves that it is all bunkum.
The LRL is directly controlled by one's predisposition or expectation
unbeknownst to one, or to be precise working below the level of
sensual detection. I do not ascribe this to the ideomotor although in
theory it resembles it. A. You are conscious beyond the level
normally
ascribed to the ideomotor and B. The word has taken on a connotation
in LRL parlance that like dowsing needs precise and careful
re-definition.
When one of the posters here mentioned the Examiner being
programmable
with any sequence of numbers I dismissed it. Now I see it needs
clarification.
If you do this you will no doubt agree it is perhaps the most
convincing argument seemingly in favor of the 'ideomotor.' However
the
answer is very simple. You are not doing it right.
All you need do is LOOK AT THE END OF YOUR LRL as you sweep. That way
your heightened sensitivity will not turn the unit to suit your whims
and indeterminable wishes. Once you tune so that you find what you
are
tuned to and not what you would like it to swing to, you are tuned.
Looking at the end of any rod will do the same. It will freeze the
device giving you that much less sensitivity, allowing detection
using
the electronics in the unit, not the tiny angle relation****p betwen
your hand muscles and your eye. You will then find the LRL detecting
properly, swinging towards the object you've tuned to, not the object
you think would be suitable for your session. Why does this work? The
same reason that is operative when you get the impossibly good swing.
There is a blind spot of hand-eye co-ordination. Looking at the end
of
the rod forms a triangle of perception that will not allow this
slippage. You can also see that if you are focussed on what you are
grasping , your aim and steadiness will improve.
The reason LRLers using L rods and passive detectors find their
conceptual targets but not their real targets is that they fall prey
to the deceptive angle betwen the hand and eye. All they need to do
is
look at the end of their rods not the target. If they can get a
response then , they can say there is a good chance they are using
the
parameters of their mortal entities (the body and the mind) to
resonate with the target. You will find though , being a normally
sensitive individual that if you look at the end of your rod your
strike rate will go down, allowing you to find real targets and not
those that appear real.
Get a grip on yourself, man!
Thess from Telling 3 years ago??
|
