On May 27, 3:26 pm, magnet_to...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 27, 6:02 am, Dallas Drewso <nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Recently, one of the Internet LRL scam artists (Vincent Blanes
> > aka Rangertell) has taken an unusual interest in this newsgroup.
> > His postings, though numerous in number, are made up completely
> > of lies and subtle advertising for his now failed dowsing rod
> > contraption (Examiner).
>
> > I really hate to discourage Vincent from posting at all, since
> > the number of his messages have driven the popularity of this
> > newsgroup to an unheard of level. For that, I am truly
> > grateful. On the other hand, since the volume of his messages
> > are really in an effort to combat The Truth About Dowsing,
> > everyone should be aware that ALL of his messages may safely be
> > completely ignored. There are simple filters and rules so you
> > needen't even see his messages.
>
> > His only purpose here is in a feeble attempt at retaliation for
> > the truth that has been told here about him, and he is generally
> > pissed that we exposed his Examiner Ranger-tell dowsing rod as a
> > complete fraud.
>
> > In closing, I can safely say this newsgroup will be here for a
> > lot longer than Vincent Blanes (aka Ranger-tell) and his fraud
> > dowsing rod will every be around.
>
> > This group, ATHL, is still the only place where The Truth About
> > Dowsing can be told, and if it wasn't cutting into Vincent's
> > profit picture (literally sla****ng it to zero) he would not be
> > flooding the newsgroup with his nonsense messages.
>
> > Thanks to everyone for your sup****t, because it is people like
> > you and newsgroups like this that are responsible for putting
> > criminals like Vincent Blanes completely out of business.
>
> > D. Drewso
> > (Originator of ATHL)
>
> It is a federal offence in every country on Earth to call a person a
> criminal when the evidence does not exist. Only a court of law can
> say
> this. The evidence is now asked for. Since there is none and it is
> known the posts need to be deleted or this will be taken further. The
> ongoing 'evidence' has not been substantiated other than too many
> 'dowsing doesn't work' statements.This battle has been going on for
> hundreds of years.Now thouigh electronics allows a better
> understanding. It is though the elder folk (one) who have not picked
> up on the new technology that straggle along, blind to the new
> possibilities and posting criminal allegations here.
>
> It is also obvious from the writing style that D. Drewso is The
> Watcher /JBlack etc., the same poster peretending to be everyone on
> this newsgroup bar those in favor of LRLs. His pompous posiiton is no
> more im****tant than Sean's at the site below. If it's criminal to
> allow people to decide before buying a metal detector that is
> infinitely better than a standard beep machine then the seller is a
> criminal. The problem is that the standard beep machine sellers or
> protagonists do not like the competition. It would not be criminal to
> take them down in the legal system.
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/=ADgroup/alttreasurehuntinglrl4du=ADmmies-
=
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Shld read
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alttreasurehuntinglrl4dummies
|
