On May 27, 6:02 am, Dallas Drewso <nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Recently, one of the Internet LRL scam artists (Vincent Blanes
> aka Rangertell) has taken an unusual interest in this newsgroup.
> His postings, though numerous in number, are made up completely
> of lies and subtle advertising for his now failed dowsing rod
> contraption (Examiner).
>
> I really hate to discourage Vincent from posting at all, since
> the number of his messages have driven the popularity of this
> newsgroup to an unheard of level. For that, I am truly
> grateful. On the other hand, since the volume of his messages
> are really in an effort to combat The Truth About Dowsing,
> everyone should be aware that ALL of his messages may safely be
> completely ignored. There are simple filters and rules so you
> needen't even see his messages.
>
> His only purpose here is in a feeble attempt at retaliation for
> the truth that has been told here about him, and he is generally
> pissed that we exposed his Examiner Ranger-tell dowsing rod as a
> complete fraud.
>
> In closing, I can safely say this newsgroup will be here for a
> lot longer than Vincent Blanes (aka Ranger-tell) and his fraud
> dowsing rod will every be around.
>
> This group, ATHL, is still the only place where The Truth About
> Dowsing can be told, and if it wasn't cutting into Vincent's
> profit picture (literally sla****ng it to zero) he would not be
> flooding the newsgroup with his nonsense messages.
>
> Thanks to everyone for your sup****t, because it is people like
> you and newsgroups like this that are responsible for putting
> criminals like Vincent Blanes completely out of business.
>
> D. Drewso
> (Originator of ATHL)
It is a federal offence in every country on Earth to call a person a
criminal when the evidence does not exist. Only a court of law can
say
this. The evidence is now asked for. Since there is none and it is
known the posts need to be deleted or this will be taken further. The
ongoing 'evidence' has not been substantiated other than too many
'dowsing doesn't work' statements.This battle has been going on for
hundreds of years.Now thouigh electronics allows a better
understanding. It is though the elder folk (one) who have not picked
up on the new technology that straggle along, blind to the new
possibilities and posting criminal allegations here.
It is also obvious from the writing style that D. Drewso is The
Watcher /JBlack etc., the same poster peretending to be everyone on
this newsgroup bar those in favor of LRLs. His pompous posiiton is no
more im****tant than Sean's at the site below. If it's criminal to
allow people to decide before buying a metal detector that is
infinitely better than a standard beep machine then the seller is a
criminal. The problem is that the standard beep machine sellers or
protagonists do not like the competition. It would not be criminal to
take them down in the legal system.
http://groups-beta.google.com/=ADgroup/alttreasurehuntinglrl4du=ADmmies
|
