On May 27, 3:16 pm, magnet_to...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 27, 3:09 pm, Jack Sparrow wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > Nota Bene:
>
> > > It is a federal offence in every country on Earth to call a person
a
> > > criminal when the evidence does not exist. Only a court of law can
say
> > > this. The evidence is now asked for. Since there is none and it is
> > > known the posts need to be deleted or this will be taken further.
The
> > > ongoing 'evidence' has not been substantiated other than too many
> > > 'dowsing doesn't work' statements.This battle has been going on for
> > > hundreds of years.Now thouigh electronics allows a better
> > > understanding. It is though the elder folk (one) who have not picked
> > > up on the new technology that straggle along, blind to the new
> > > possibilities and posting criminal allegations here.
>
> > > It is also obvious from the writing style that D. Drewso is The
> > > Watcher /JBlack etc., the same poster peretending to be everyone on
> > > this newsgroup bar those in favor of LRLs. His pompous posiiton is
no
> > > more im****tant than Sean's at the site below. If it's criminal to
> > > allow people to decide before buying a metal detector that is
> > > infinitely better than a standard beep machine then the seller is a
> > > criminal. The problem is that the standard beep machine sellers or
> > > protagonists do not like the competition. It would not be criminal
to
> > > take them down in the legal system.
>
> > > Courtesy Alternative: That should be the entire line.Cut it and see
if it doesn't work.
>
> > http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alttreasurehuntinglrl4dummies-
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Nota Bene:
> > It is a federal offence in every country on Earth to call a person a
> > criminal when the evidence does not exist. Only a court of law can say
> > this. The evidence is now asked for. Since there is none and it is
> > known the posts need to be deleted or this will be taken further. The
> > ongoing 'evidence' has not been substantiated other than too many
> > 'dowsing doesn't work' statements.This battle has been going on for
> > hundreds of years.Now thouigh electronics allows a better
> > understanding. It is though the elder folk (one) who have not picked
> > up on the new technology that straggle along, blind to the new
> > possibilities and posting criminal allegations here.
> > It is also obvious from the writing style that D. Drewso is The
> > Watcher /JBlack etc., the same poster peretending to be everyone on
> > this newsgroup bar those in favor of LRLs. His pompous posiiton is no
> > more im****tant than Sean's at the site below. If it's criminal to
> > allow people to decide before buying a metal detector that is
> > infinitely better than a standard beep machine then the seller is a
> > criminal. The problem is that the standard beep machine sellers or
> > protagonists do not like the competition. It would not be criminal to
> > take them down in the legal system.
> > Courtesy Alternative: That should be the entire line.Cut it and see if
it doesn't work.
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alttreasurehuntinglrl4dummies
|
