Nota Bene:
It is a federal offence in every country on Earth to call a person a
criminal when the evidence does not exist. Only a court of law can say
this. The evidence is now asked for. Since there is none and it is
known the posts need to be deleted or this will be taken further. The
ongoing 'evidence' has not been substantiated other than too many
'dowsing doesn't work' statements.This battle has been going on for
hundreds of years.Now thouigh electronics allows a better
understanding. It is though the elder folk (one) who have not picked
up on the new technology that straggle along, blind to the new
possibilities and posting criminal allegations here.
It is also obvious from the writing style that D. Drewso is The
Watcher /JBlack etc., the same poster peretending to be everyone on
this newsgroup bar those in favor of LRLs. His pompous posiiton is no
more im****tant than Sean's at the site below. If it's criminal to
allow people to decide before buying a metal detector that is
infinitely better than a standard beep machine then the seller is a
criminal. The problem is that the standard beep machine sellers or
protagonists do not like the competition. It would not be criminal to
take them down in the legal system.
Courtesy Alternative:
http://groups-beta.google.com/=ADgroup/alttreasurehun=
tinglrl4du=ADmmies
